It seems the masterplan for digging Gordon Brown out of the very deep hole he has found himself in is to levy a Windfall Tax on the huge profits made by oil companies.Every 3 months we hear about enormous profits from energy companies in the UK with their excuses for the increased energy costs being that they have rising costs of their own.
So a windfall tax is perfect. If oil/energy companies are unnecessarily raising the price of power then we will reclaim some of the money through a tax on super-profits. If their price increases are indeed necessary then there will be no profits which we can tax. (UPDATE: Indeed, with today's news of 3-month profits for BP of £3.4bn, it seems it is the former.)
Everyone wins right? Well, yes, everyone does win, and no more so than the SNP.
We've heard for decades the Nationalist claims that It's Scotland's Oil, that the commodity is valuable enough to help finance an independent Scotland and if we built up a North Sea Fund we'd be amongst the richest independent countries in the World.
Well, what more evidence do we need now? The UK Government is feeling the squeeze financially so who do they turn to? Why, those oil companies that are positively bathed in money thanks to Scotland's oil.
Yes, not content with taxing petrol at the pumps to the tune of 70% and taking 30% of the profits made by BP and Shell through Corporation Tax, the Government are going to milk this cash cow for even more money simply because they can.
If you believe Scotland should share its wealth with the rest of the UK then I can perfectly respect that point of view. But let's no longer have the false claim that Scotland could not sustain itself in the medium term on oil revenue.
With a Windfall Tax, Gordon Brown will be disproving the lie.
6 comments:
Jeff,
I agree that targeting excess profits is a valid government action.
My concern though is that this money will simply be used as part of general revenue, which I still think is short-sighted (see below for my extended thoughts).
http://ideasofcivilisation.blogspot.com/2008/06/oil-oil-everywhere-but-not-drop-to.html
Perhaps oil revenue is now too ingrained in general expenditure in this country but it would be good if new monies i.e. those from windfalls could be used more strategically.
I really am going to try and get my mum a job at the Treasury (a joke which only makes sense with the link above!)
"Excessive profits" - please, explain what "excessive profits" are?
I would find it somewhat troublesome that in an independent Scotland we'd be taxing companies for "excessive profts" while trying to compete with low tax countries such as Ireland and Eastern Europe. In addition, surely if the state takes a slice of a company's profits, what's to stop said company passing the cost on to the consumer? That's where real price inflation starts.
Ewan,
I think it's a fairly simple logic. Any profits above, I don't know, £5bn would be deemed 'extraordinary' or 'super' and taxed at 50%. That's the logic at least...
And you're severely mistaken if you think an independent Scotland would applying the 30% tax rate to companies. The SNP have been on record for years talking about using a lower corporation tax rate to stimulate growth.
So oil companies would enjoy a 12.5% tax rate (like Ireland) but any 'super profits' would attract 30-40% or so.
I'm making these figures up by the way, don't think it's some sort of policy I've read somewhere!!
And to answer your last point, competitive open markets and price fixing laws would ensure that prices remained at a correct level.
Windfall tax is a fairly standard theory by the way.
Ewan,
As Jeff says the idea of a windfasll tax is not new or unusual. Although I do appreciate that fact alone isn't enough to justify special taxation.
I would argue that in any circumstance where a natural and finite resource has so greatly appreciated in value, to the extent that its worth has increased significantly over a relatively short period of time, there is an argument in ensuring the benefits of this are shared across wider society.
However as I've said in previous posts I would prefer that this money be used for future investment rather than one-off general expenditure.
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,酒店,
Post a Comment