Home from home

*** Currently blogging at http://www.betternation.org/ ***

Friday, March 6, 2009

Back to a Mickey Mouse Parliament?

As we all know, yesterday in the Chamber we were treated to a majority vote in favour of, amongst other things, "calls on the Scottish Government to concentrate its efforts on economic recovery and abandon its divisive plans for a Referendum Bill for the remainder of its term of office."

I found it somewhat ironic that opposition parties were complaining about an unconstructive Government in the midst of a distinctly negative "SNP Failures Debate" but the mild hypocrisy continues.

We have George Foulkes bringing forward yet another motion complaining about a perfectly reasonable book that Mike Russell wrote over 10 years ago and I have learned that next week there is a debate scheduled under the name of Karen Gillon for "The Commonwealth at 60".

Clearly no positives can be derived from such a debate for the Scottish public unless you are against independence.

The Scottish Parliament was derided as 'Mickey Mouse' time and again when it first got going. It has earned some respectability since then but I do worry that the political stunts and horridly cheap PQs, motions and debates are going to erode the value that Holyrood has.

Perhaps the MSPs should take the lead of KPMG and implement a 4-day working week for themselves, on 80% of their salary? Now there's a cost-cutting measure that would go down well with the public.

10 comments:

Richard Thomson said...

Clearly no positives can be derived from such a debate for the Scottish public unless you are against independence.

Why so?

Jeff said...

Hi Richard,

I personally think that it's ok to celebrate 60 years of the Commonwealth, have a private party, bring out a memorative coin but I can't think of a single reason why we should spend Parliament's resources having a debate with that as the topic.

What is there to discuss?

I personally think that it's part of the 'Celebrating Britain' campaign as fronted by Gordon Brown for so long, with taking on the SNP at the back of his mind. If that makes me cynical, then so be it.

But I accept I may be missing something...

Richard Thomson said...

Well, given that HM The Queen would remain head of state in an independent Scotland, you can take it as a given that Scotland would be in the Commonwealth also.

I'd have thought it was a wonderful opportunity to talk about the social union, the Scottish diaspora, the legacy - for good or ill - of our colonial past, and shared cultural links.

Not to say cite a large number of states which have left the rule of the UK, and gone on to have perfectly amicable relations, despite the prophesies of doom and despair which frequently went before?

Jeff said...

Perfectly reasonable points Richard.

Your suggestion of topics would make for a great evening debate, perhaps in some Scottish cultural setting and I can now certainly see why one of a pro-independence bent could use the debate to one's advantage. Is Parliament really the place for it though?

But my main point is, if it's all hands to the pump for the economy as some parties would have us believe (particularly in light of yesterday's vote) why is this on the agenda?

Richard Thomson said...

Is Parliament really the place for it though?

Don't see why not... every Parliament that I've ever encountered has means of holding general debates for their own sake. If it raises members' sights for an hour or so from the humdrum, then that can only be a good thing, surely?

But my main point is, if it's all hands to the pump for the economy as some parties would have us believe (particularly in light of yesterday's vote) why is this on the agenda?

Well, that's one which only they can explain - I'm not even going to try to explain the tortured posturing inherent in such an 'argument'!

Anonymous said...

"Well, given that HM The Queen would remain head of state in an independent Scotland..."

Richard, if I remember correctly the SNP position is that if Scotland were to become independent there would be another vote on whether to keep our ties to the monarchy.

Richard Thomson said...

That's true, Anon. She would remain head of state until such time as people decided otherwise in a referendum.

Aye We Can ! said...

"Well, given that HM The Queen would remain head of state in an independent Scotland,"

Wee Eck's independent Scotland you mean. Like Sir George Mathieson will no doubt remain our economic chief advsor, Tulloch Homes write our housing poicy, and eveything else decided by Eck, John and Nicola in a wee room and then imposed on eyt rest of us, incuding the SNP cabinet

But I fear not too much - because the peope of Scotand will never vote for such a narrow version of "independence". Thye wilwant more - wnt just swap a union jack over edinburgh castle for a SAltire

The Republic of Scotland is not only my prefered option but is the ony option that will inspre, invove, work and deliver. Top doon government donty work, and the monarchy is the symbol of it, wee Eck Scotland current exponent of it.

And "Lord Foulkex" - I rest my case. You cna slag him off all you want, but wee Eck's Queen appointed him. "Off with their heads" these crtitics of the Red Baron - treason in our own time.

"0ff withtheir heads" those internal critics of wee eck and Nicola. An SNP card dont liberate, it improsons

Tonya said...

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Alanna

http://www.craigslistsimplified.info

freefun0616 said...

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,

,酒店,