Home from home

*** Currently blogging at http://www.betternation.org/ ***

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Calman Commission's report is due out tomorrow


Without wanting to show up the complete uselessness of my subject line, the Calman Commission's report is due out tomorrow.

Thanks to a leaked email we have been given a sneak preview of what new powers Holyrood can expect to have devolved to them in the near future:


  • Half of income tax will be received directly by the Scottish Government

  • Collection of air passenger tax, landfill tax, aggregate tax* and stamp duty

  • Power to set drink driving limits

  • Power to ban airguns
  • Considerable borrowing powers to finance public projects

Now, on the face of it, more powers for a relatively toothless Government is to be welcomed. Obviously striking some sort of relationship between who earns the money and who spends the money is a sensible step. We've seen how disjointed it can be when the Scottish Government receives a wad of cash each year and is then able to go on a £30bn spending spree with little responsibility for knock-on effects. They'll know that same £30bn will be waiting for them a year hence.


The idea of having a lower drink driving limit north of the border makes sense and will bring us in line with our European neighbours. Indeed, the counter-argument that it would be nonsensical to have an island with different drink drive limits kind of falls down when you think that Continental Europe has that very situation and seems to get on just fine.


Banning airguns will be long overdue but it is the question of tax that I think is a bit messy, a bit of a Highland Fudge if you pardon the pun.


I don't understand the logic in giving Scotland some income tax revenue but then reducing this extra income from the block grant. Will it not just lead to the same result?


If we receive £32bn a year in the block grant, then receive £6bn in Income Tax revenue and then have £6bn deducted from the block grant as a result then we still come back to £32bn. So I'm looking forward to the detail of how this will work as it's all a bit Modigliani-Miller at this stage.


Presumably there will be scope for Scotland to receive more money or less money depending on whether the Scottish economy is successful or not, as yet it is unclear. But either way, it all smacks too much of falling between two stools. Either full fiscal autonomy or none at all is the preferable route to take, you don't merely split the difference and have half fiscal autonomy just to try to please everyone, surely? Reform Scotland has already said the proposals don't go far enough and a Heriot Watt principal believes borrowing powers are compromised by the continuance of the block grant. So no ringing endorsement from the expected concluions so far.


My overriding concern however is the lack of scrutiny that the Calman report will receive.


Wendy Alexander has said that Sir Kenneth Calman should be congratulated for his expediency in creating this report in just 18 months when similar reports took up to 10 years in the past. I personally would have thought that Wendy should be concerned that it was all a bit of a rushed job. Imagine congratulating someone on their report before evening seeing it? I reckon that is an indication of how easily the Calman recommendations will glide through the Scottish Parliament irrepective of what they may be.


I have no doubt that Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems will have decided long ago to nod through this report, whatever it may contain, simply for political expediency in order to combat the SNP's dream of independence.


Whatever tomorrow's report may contain, and I have no doubt that a lot of it is good stuff, at the very least we deserve a referendum on the content of any subsequent Bill that may be prepared. We voted for a Scottish Parliament and we voted for tax-varying powers but if there is to be a substantial change to the powers of Holyrood and a clear risk that the significant alterations won't attract the proper scrutiny that they deserve from our MSPs, then we need to step in and have our say.

12 comments:

northeastnat said...

Interesting that you talk about the report being a rushed job when 2/3 of the party leaders pictured with Calman at the launch have since left their posts!

I think the SNP will be perfectly relaxed about this report.

More powers gives them the potential to demonstrate yet further competence in government, which may whet the appetite for further powers beyond that, or possibly even full independence.

Imagine, though, a scenario where Calman recommends the devolution of more powers, and Westminster says no.

What influence might that have on public opinion ahead of a possible independence referendum?

Jeff said...

Yep, I reckon you're right. Mike Russell and Kenny MacAskill certainly looked pretty relaxed about it all in interviews today.

For me personally, it may be ok in the short term to take 50% of tax income but a halfway house is hardly a fitting long term solution.

Interesting scenario you paint there with London saying no to Calman's suggestions. Gordon Brown certainly didn't seem too keen when it all started as a 'review'.

And will Iain Gray or Jim Murphy fly the flag for Labour on this one? Could be an interesting development too...

Anonymous said...

the power to ban airguns....wow.
it's a slippery slope though,; the snp will not stop until they have banned WMD and nuclear weapons...mark my words.

Lallands Peat Worrier said...

Apparently, the full report - and the "executive summary" for the lazy - will materialise at http://www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk at 9.00am.

Just the sort of light reading one can enjoy with one's morning coffee.

CassiusClaymore said...

Classic unionist trap. End of story. It'll do, for now....

Sean said...

Is it just me, or does he look like Jonathon Watson's portrayal of Chick Young in that picture?

Chick Young said...

He he he!

I, Chick Young, standing where I am, which is here, cannot believe I, Chick Young, would be compared to Sir Kenneth of Calman. I, Chick Young, would not, which is to say wouldnae, associate myself, Chick Young, with such reprobates as Wendy Alexander and Annabel Goldie.

I, Chick Young, would prefer such stalwarts of Unionism as Sir David Minty of Moonbeams and Lord Donald "Whaurs yer sash" Findlay. How I, Chick Young, could swing myself down from my Go Ape orchard to meet such vagabonds as Wendy, which is to say, bagabones, is beyond my, Chick Young's, comprehension.

Yours,

Chick Young
HMYOI Polmont

Sean said...

Chick, you'll have us dancing in the streets of Mirren with any more comments like that!

Wardog said...

If it is as has been reported it';s largely piecemeal and hardly 'constitutional' at all.

A rejigging of income tax (which funnily enough would ensure that the treasury are indeed able to handle LIT and a few things the SNP have been fighting for over the last 3-4 years.

Damp squib, watch it disappear.

Stuart Dickson said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jeff said...

Good stuff Lallands. I'm off for my toasted banana roll and Americano before the 9am read. Salmond was just on Radio Scotland welcoming the proposals while saying they don't go far enough. His point that you can't stimulate an economy without full fiscal autonomy will surely resonate with the public.

Montague Burton said...

Interesting that members of the IEG have a 'self-denying ordinance' in place prohibiting them from speaking individually on the recommendations until close of business on the 19th of June, when press interest will apparently have subsided...