I'll be honest, if I could have picked the Labour Shadow Cabinet I would have chosen something along the lines of what Iain Gray came up with yesterday. And just to be clear, I mean I would have picked this team with the SNP's interests at heart rather than Labour's.There was certainly something panicked about the way the Iain Gray went about this surprise move.
Just yesterday Henry McLeish issued a thinly veiled attack on Gray in saying that Labour faced being in opposition "for a generation" and was "intellectually exhausted". The SNP simultaneously issued a press release focussing on Labour's "leadership vacuum" and how "whispering campaign against Iain Gray's beleagured leadership just got louder".
So if Gray wanted to play down the suggestion that there was a crisis of confidence at the heart of his leadership (and his team) then now would be precisely the wrong time to ring the changes. But rung them he has.
The impressive John Park has been moved to a behind-the-scenes position as Shadow Minister without Portfolio. This has to go down as a demotion given John was in the crucial Economy and Skills Shadow Minister position during a recession.
As a consequence of John Park being stripped of his brief, Andy Kerr incorporates Economy into his Finance brief. (Presumably 'Skills' are no longer important for Labour, even if the recession is still ongoing) Andy Kerr has generated a lot of noise and heat during his two years in this position but he can't reasonably be considered an effective performer. His response to John Swinney's draft budget was embarrassing when set against the reasonable responses of Derek Brownlee and Jeremy Purvis.
Jackie Baillie at Health won't result in Nicola Sturgeon losing any sleep. Similarly, Des McNulty coming in for the lamentable Rhona Brankin is the political equivalent of a no score draw.
And, saving the best for last, how is Richard Baker still in the Shadow Justice position? I mean really? What incredibly foolish loyalty from Iain Gray there. I am willing to kindly suggest that Richard is merely inexperienced and needs time before he should be given such an important, difficult position but I tell you what, that was the best £520 Richard has ever spent in his life.
The full team sheet proves that Labour is in desperate need of new talent. It is the same faces from the Lab/Lib administration with the many backbenchers who have not made it into Shadow Cabinet positions proving the lack of strength in depth Labour has. The party must put some fresh talent up in 2011 or Henry McLeish's prediction of being in opposition for a generation will surely prove accurate.
Even then, incredibly, some of the most capable in Labour's ranks have been excluded.
Where is Hugh Henry? The refreshingly dry MSP who is effective, genuine and, best of all, not afraid to say to "bullshit" to top civil servants.
Where is Ken MacIntosh? The perfectly reasonable and articulate East Renfrewshire MSP is denied a front-line role and given Ken has the fight of his life in his constituency in 2011, he could do with a raised profile.
And where is Wendy Alexander? The former leader of the Labour MSPs was described by Iain Gray today as "somebody who still has a big future in Scottish politics." and he is "certain she will come back to a front bench role." So why isn't Wendy in the new Shadow Cabinet?
Or Jack McConnell for that matter? With no Malawi job in the offing you would think an ex-First Minister could provide a better contribution to Scottish public life than taking up space on the backbenches.
It's bizarre. Utterly bizarre.
Iain Gray is already on the run just over a year into the job and I cannot see his reshuffle today stopping the rot. Indeed, as Malc points out, once London support is cut off from May 2010 Gray will have to seriously up his game and his profile.
I see little today to suggest that Labour's top team has it in them to take the SNP on over the next two years.
9 comments:
Last 2 paragraphs.
But they do have the BBC and the Scottish press to help them....
I'm not really in a position to judge your comments, but that seemed an extremely knowledgable post.
The point about Wendy Alexander (and, to a lesser extent, Jack McConnell - it's obvious why a new leader wouldn't want a predocessor hanging about) is a good one. She's always struck me as a bright one - but also someone who knows it. A touch Mandelsonian, perhaps.
Traditional politicing dictates that having an old leader hanging around overshadows the current leader - as the press want to highlight differences and problems and whatever; which is why, especially at Westminster, the former leaders usually move to the Lords or whatever.
I think this is changing though - Swinney is in the Scottish Cabinet doing a fine job, and IDS and WH are both quite high profile Tories - so I don't see any problem with bringing Wendy back for Labour. Just because she didn't have a good time as leader, doesn't mean she'd not do a fine job back up there (cf John Swinney again).
I would be more wary about including Jack though - the Labour Party have to effectively convey the idea that they're a government in waiting, so it's pointless to include members who will not be seeking re-election in 2011. The 18months we have left before the election have to be used by the Labour party hacks to get their portfolios learnt, and under their command.
Although of course, all of that also depends how many former Labour MPs will be seeking election to the Scottish Parliament - Mr Murphy as the LOLSIP anyone?
Jeff that must be the first time in recorded history that the words 'Impressive, John and Park' have flowed together in one sentence.
Wasn't he bumped from election duties after Glasgow east?
The interesting point for me is that labour are using 27 MSP's to cover 16 Ministers...
Sorry strike that, they've just remembered to fill the Transport brief by bringing back Wendy Alexander's best pal Charlie Gordon. The no very impressive James Kelly has been brought in to provide back up to the boy Baker as deputy Justice spokesman. Kenny MacAskill, must be terrified.
So that's us up to 28 labour MSP's to cover 16 Ministers, how bad must you be not to make Gray's front benches team?
@Montague Burns: How bad must you be not to make the Shadow Cabinet? Helen Eadie bad! ;)
Thanks BoT.
I don't really sign up to the notion that a leader should keep ex-leaders out of Cabinets or Shadow Cabinets. Swinney, Hague, Duncan Smith spring to mind immediately.
If Wendy or Jack have the ability and still have the hunger, why not get them in there?
Fair point though Grogipher, if McConnell isn't seeking reelection in 2011 then there's a valid reason there not to include him.
And I've enjoyed John Park's contributions and 'tweets' Monty. Seems like his 'shining star' reputation is well-deserved. But hey, it's all relative ;)
Interesting article Jeff. Begets the question though, who do you think might be in and out in any future SNP reshuffle?
I'm not sure if it does beget the question to be honest Anon. The SNP Government is doing an impressive job according to most so the onus was always on Labour to make changes rather than the SNP.
But to answer your question, I do think Hyslop would be the only one facing a potential reshuffle. The Education Secretary has a hard job and the attacks she's faced are misplaced to a certain extent but I reckon someone who appears more confident in that area would be a better shout.
However, the 2011 election isn't that far away so would the SNP want to help suggestions they aren't strong in a certain field by changing the team when they don't need to?
Let's be honest, there won't be much business being done in the next year or so, so personalities in charge of briefs won't be as important as it is at the start of a parliamentary term.
And overall, MacAskill, Sturgeon, Swinney, Robison etc etc are a very strong group.
Post a Comment