Home from home

*** Currently blogging at http://www.betternation.org/ ***

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The Death of Blogging

Like any blogger, I am addicted to hits. Why are the numbers up, why are they down? Where have people come from and can I snare an IP address to work out who people are? I check statcounter more regularly than I do Facebook which probably makes me less of a person but as a Statistics Masters graduate and a numbers nerd, it was ever going to be thus.

One thing I have noticed through this addictive pastime is that for as long as the past year or so I have had very few hits from new sources. Don't get me wrong, there have been some excellent new blogs which have kindly linked to me (and linkage has generally been reciprocated) but in my first year of blogging getting hits from new sources was a regular occurrence such was the rate of new blogs taking off and interest in blogs from numerous media sources.

Maybe I am not proactive enough in seeking out blogs I can just directly ask for links from but the crux of the matter is that there are less new blogs breaking through out there, the retirals are outnumbering the startups. The Scottish scene has already been hit by the hanging up of the Scottish Unionist and Malc in the Burgh keyboards with fellow Total Politics 'top-tenner' Caron significantly (and regrettably) scaling back her post rate (albeit due to ill health). Many other blogs are starting and stopping with activation energy seemingly in short supply.

The difficulties in getting a blog up and running are probably greater now than they were even a year or two ago. I get the impression the rate of new readers of blogs in general has slowed dramatically with those that do read blogs having their personal favourites and sticking to them. One of the reasons I created a links page of some 200 websites (and growing) was to ensure that I read different voices and get different viewpoints on a regular basis. More often than not it's the established (perhaps even dangerously cosy) club of UK bloggers that have new posts available to read on the real-time feed. If someone was to start a blog today and looked to break into the Total Politics top 100 they would surely balk at the prospect.

Perhaps, just perhaps, blogging has already had its heyday? If it can happen to MySpace it can happen to Blogger.

Where is the latest wave of angry upstarts energetically tearing strips off the establishment with their fists of blogging fury? Pretenders to the throne are generally too deeply wedded to the party line to be serious contenders as the radical new political voice.

There are, of course, long-established beacons of light. The Iain Dale and Guido Fawkes duopoly has a healthy incongruence. Iain has a straighter approach, directly tackling policy issues and, more often than not, his calm dissemblance points out the frustrating inadequacies in Labour, Lib Dem and often Tory positions on any number of issues. Guido is less interested in policy and more interested in bringing down the troughers and ending the corruption in Westminster.

Both are independent, both have plenty of material to work with and, despite their differing approcahes to blogging, both are now pretty much indispensable.

Beyond that however, the highest profile bloggers are the Ben Brogans, the Paul Waughs, the Tom Harris', the Fraser Nelsons, the Nick Robinsons, the Dan Hannans, the John Prescotts. Bloggers who have recently muscled into the scene with relative ease, perhaps not appreciating the struggle for 'hits' that faces any new blogger. Journalists or MPs who arguably have business interests at heart rather than being unbiased seekers of truth.

Their online sites, although tremendous reads each in their own right, are merely an extension of the old world, the journalists vs the politicians with the public shut out of the debate and left to banter amongst themselves in the comment wilderness. With the luxury of regular work hours at their disposal to update their blogs, the true independent bloggers are always at a disadvantage snatching time in the early morning, lunchbreak or in the evening to contribute to the debate.

It is perhaps too self-indulgent to suggest that blogs ever bore a direct and imminent threat to the viability of newspapers but it's clear that newspaper companies are splattering the blogosphere with websites of their own in order to swamp the market and mitigate any risk that did exist.

Blogging only really took off after the 2005 general election. Is the online adventure effectively over before the next one in 2010?

23 comments:

Josher said...

I discovered your blog about a week ago, as it was recommended to me via. Google Reader. As such, I interact with it almost exclusively via. Reader - I wonder if I then count towards the statistics that you obsess over?

I don't think that blogging is dead - I have my own 150-strong list and I like to expand it fairly regularly. RSS readers probably obfuscate the true picture, though.

Marcia said...

Blogs come and go, it depends if they are interesting to read. Some don't have the staying power or are full with enthusiasm at the beginning but work or family life make them difficult to keep updated and them people then go elsewhere.

o/t Just got an invite to a poll about voting intentions for Scotland at the the GE.

PJ said...

Perhaps blogging isn't so much dying as regenerating, Doctor Who styley. The initial thrill of a new information platform has worn off and now blogging needs to evolve to hold the interest of its current users and also attract new bloggers.

I can't imagine where you all find the time to maintain your blogs and especially to post as frequently as you do Jeff. I know that when I first starting reading blogs I would subscribe to maybe a dozen RSS feeds and read those every day, but inevitabley I found myself with such an enormous list of blogs I liked to read that it became impossible to follow them all religiously. Ironic really as the appeal of blogs was initially as a speedy means to find out what was happening in the World (particularly in the political sphere) and now it would be quicker to read a newspaper (shock horror) than wade through my voluminous RSS feeds! And for some reason it really bugs me to see those feeds in bold and unread, I probably need to do a bit of feed culling...

I share your disappointment when a blogger that I respect and enjoy reading has to take a break or cut-back on the frequency of their posts, but I can only imagine it must be a bit of a relief from the pressure of the expectation of regularly having to write a post that will be subject to the scrutiny, and often criticism, of many others.

Whatever the motivation to blog it must be strong enough to commit time and effort but also to be able to bear the brunt of scathing attacks. I guess for some it is a personal agenda to promote themselves, and that's fine, for others a desire to promote others, also okay.

I don't often read or contribute to blogs that are full of negativity and personal attacks but I thoroughly enjoy those that challenge viewpoints and provoke informed debates. I hope quality will win over quantity, and that blogs like your's and the others I regularly follow will continue to evolve and grow in popularity - and feed your stats fetish at the same time!

Math Campbell said...

I actually tried to blog several times; every time i did, something came up and it died after 5 or so posts.
This time I'm determined and I restarted my blog about 2 weeks ago now…
The real issue I fear is that the independent types (and I'd count me in that line) are hard-pressed, as you say by the likes of Tom Harris, who as an MP already has public-interest and appeal before he even sits down…
This worries me because, whilst I like reading Tom's one-sided misguided views, he is a Labour MP. He'll pull out the Labour line. A Tory will pull out the Tory line, an SNP member, the SNP line (although I will call the SNP out on anything I don't like, but I am a member)….

Where's the truly independent types that will go for gold no matter where it's buried?

Malc said...

When we discussed "the death of blogging" a couple of weeks ago, I didn't for one minute think that I'd put mine to bed just 2 weeks later. I was arguing the opposite - that there are more blogs now than there were 2, 3 or 5 years ago.

And while that may be the case, competition in this regard might not be great. I don't mean competition in the same sense that newspapers do - and nor do I mean that people shouldn't start a blog if they want to simply because the field is saturated. What I mean - and what PJ alluded to - is that readers (and bloggers) only have a finite amount of time. You can't possibly read everything everyone says. I find it difficult enough keeping up with what you say!

I don't think it is dead, merely saturated. You've just got to make sure you keep the quality there - cream rises to the top. And yours is much better than Tom Harris'!

Daniel1979 said...

Jeff,

Without counting, I thought there were more new blogs than outgoing ones. But that was just my perception. But when one blog goes, there does tend to be a short flurry.

I have been blogging almost exactly a year now, and the incoming traffic is about consistent all year since February(ish), but would be very low for a Guido or a Dale because I too rely on the smaller blogs to link to me. None of the very big boys link to me, ever, and only a couple of the well known - but not super busy blogs link to me - as always, I publish who is sending me the most traffic at the start of each month to say "thank you" and you may recall a few months ago you topped that list.

I would agree as an observation (but not a complaint) that the new bloggers who have name recognition have had the benefit of plenty of inward links simply from setting up a blog... you have made the point here before about the currency equivalent of being in the Daley Dozen or getting a link from Guido and as soon as someone anyone has hear of gets set up, many of the bigger blogs write it up and give them a good starting audience from which to build and maintain a base from. However, the most interesting of the top bloggers are the ones that have little or no political or journalistic background. So in my opinion the bigger blogs are not blogs better than some of us bedroom bloggers because of their relative positions in various ranking systems, and I do not think a Wikio ranking is an indication of whether somebody is a good writer or not. But we all measure success differently.

I guess in fairness to my point it is worth acknowledging that there are a few new bloggers who have been going under a year, without pre-existing name recognition who have broken into the Wikio and Total Politics Top 100 so it is possible if you are good enough (though, that does not obviously count me as I did not break the top 100 of either).

As for new sources linking to me I would agree with your point, when I got going I got some good links early on, however it is rare I spot a new blog linking to me in the analytics, and sometimes now I gain one and I lose one in a short period of time. New bloggers will always look to the bigger, well known blogs and give them links and refer to them in posts – it is the natural behaviour of a newbie, we all did it. You mention about asking for links, but I think I have only ever asked one other blogger for a link on their blogroll – and I have never been asked by anyone if I would add them – but then again I will add anything that looks a little interesting. Perhaps that is where I am going wrong.

My prediction would be that in January and leading into the GE next year there will be loads of new bloggers starting out - as it is a popular, easy and cheap (or free!), way to get ones voice heard and have a good rant. I would also then suspect that following the Election there will be a sharp decline in bloggers. I have thought myself that I will look at whether or not I wish to continue at that point, as, hopefully there will be no Labour Government for me to bitch about any more. But whatever happens, I do not think this is the beginning of the end for the Blogosphere, if it is left to grow organically as it is now, people will come and go but overall the curve will be an upwards one. With the decline in the print media and an increasing separation in people minds between news and commentary, the market for a diverse blogosphere will continue to grow; and I reckon we are still in the embryo stages here - the potential is still enormous.

Rab C. Nesbitt said...

Excellent and interesting post. Perhaps the word 'blog' is over used. To me, a blog is a personal thing. It shouldn't be about spouting the party line, or be linked to a newspaper or other media. Perhaps blogging needs a bit more definition.

dazmando said...

An excellant blog indeed will add yours to my list. http://bracknellblog.blogspot.com/ only started in May and its up to 180 in wilko general blogs. Not the top 100 yet. If u have a independance and balance with your anger you can get somewhere. I'm not a great networker online due to time but I will expand my list. Its about having something different to say and offer. There is however now an establishment and when u think about it there can only be so many bloggers after all there's only so many of us who r really into politics.

Andrew BOD said...

Jeff

Like someone said already, I don't know how you manage churn out numerous quality threads most days of the week, AND answer many of the posters' comments. It's your blog I hit first because you generally have your finger on the current affairs pulse.

What I like about your blog is that you have a loose allegiance to a political party, but have no qualms about criticising them, and putting forward your own independent thought. Also, as far as I am aware, you don't have an unwritten censorship policy, like Ms Dugdale and Mr Harris.

And on that last point, I find it difficult to find a 'unionist' blogger who is either willing to debate points on merit, or even debate at all. This is frustrating but symptomatic of the polarisation of political viewpoints in Scotland, despite the fact that policy difference is minimal. It seems 'what you are' is more important than 'what you do'.

Stuart Winton said...

As I said at the time of the semi-hysteria over the Danniel Hannan video, the potential impact of Web 2.0 seems a bit overdone, and the way some people were talking you'd think that in the next GE all the campaigning would be done via the media and online rather than via traditional methods, but of course that's nonsense, as was demonstrated last week in Glasgow.

Of course, more sensible opinion realised the limitations of Web 2.0 - in the immediate future at least - and indeed this is to an extent linked to a post I did on my own blog earlier today, not to mention an article in the Times by Danny Finkelstein: the vast majority of the population are almost wholly disengaged from politics and the likes of blogs are another world of which they know little and frankly aren't really interested in.

Thus the influence of the blogosphere is largely limited to politicos and professionals and essentially amounts to preaching to the converted. And Malc uses the word that probably sums it all up nicely - the market is now saturated, and to extend the analogy from market economics there's little hope of hugely increased demand to stimulate supply, although of course as with the 'creative destruction' of free markets, blogs will come and go.

And to use another concept from competitive markets, some blogs - like Iain Dale, Guido and to a lesser extent Jeff - have first mover advantage, so it's always more difficult for later blogs to make the breakthrough.

And just as there's now no strict dichotomy between the blogs and the MSM, by the same token for any blogger to get really big they'll have to bridge the gap with the MSM, as Giudo and Iain Dale have already demonstrated.

I mean, what proportion of the population have heard of Daniel Hannan?

He's still unknown outside the political/blogosphere bubble.

Jeff said...

Thanks for the comment Josher, a fine point about Google Reader as such tools weren't around a while back and will of course cut down on the number of links from blog to blog. That said, I don't really know what Google Reader is but I can have a guess at least!

Jeff said...

'First mover advantage'. I think I was basically trying to say those 3 words instead of my 600.

I like PJ's idea of an evolution taking place. The 'bedding in' has taken place now it maybe needs to feel comfortable with where it sits. But then i guess by its nature blogging is regeneratory so to stay too still for too long would damage the brand. Who knows, one can dwell on these ultimately futile thoughts too much perhaps but that post had been cooking for a while. As for my post rate which was alluded to, early mornings, long lunches and barely any tv adds up to a lot of free time I guess. Not having any kids helps too! As for motivation, having top quality pub chat at one's fingertips on the issues of the day is great. And better for one's liver this way ;)

Jeff said...

Daniel,

On reflection I think you're right, there probably are more new blogs than retiring ones. I guess I was trying to say that new and truly independent, untethered blogs aren't filling the 'top' spots as quickly as they are falling out of them. In terms of the new blogs that are breaking through I guess a lot of it comes down to patronage. A nakedly Tory or Lib Dem blog will receive more links from ConHome or LDV and advance through a certain (understandable) tribal loyalty rather than, perhaps, quality. Being strongly wedded to a party also helps to define your 'character', your role on the blogging scene. I read your blog but it's not immediately obvious which side of the many fences you come down on which could maybe count against you. It shouldn't but it could.
I also think you're right that a lot of blogs might drop off after the 2010 election, it can provide a natural end. Of course the big blogs and journo's will continue which exacerbates the problem of new bloggers getting through.

I have half an eye on the 2011 election to hang up the keyboard but i have to even make it that far first!

Stephen Glenn said...

Jeff I know that a couple of bloggers in the Total Politics Top 100 are new starts, Mark Reckon's being one that springs to mind. So it is accheivable.

Blogs always come and go, its a bit like a football team in that aspect.

Anonymous said...

http://jomuqubo.hostrator.com http://cadotahe.t35.com http://kazansex.blogspot.com/
порно фото слайдами
http://fenwe.rack111.com http://weruno.nightmail.ru http://daffsex.x10hosting.com
менты порно
vrotmnenogi

Holyrood Patter said...

i was actually about to post this week saying i hadnt been too well for the past month, but i do resolve to get it up and running again (you may have noticed me dipping my toes, going back to commenting again etc).

Holyrood Patter said...

i was actually about to post this week saying i hadnt been too well for the past month, but i do resolve to get it up and running again (you may have noticed me dipping my toes, going back to commenting again etc).

Alex said...

Everything is changing. Consumer 'bubble' economic theology is out and the minging junk politics that went with it too.

A revolution of sorts is underway. Blogs will be irrelevant and new ones may well bring in the traffic again.

Alternative info outlets are vital. Fresh thinking is waiting to burst through and the establishment clings on.

What was interesting no longer is. People who had an inclination to blog no longer do. Lives are changing, people are on the move..

http://scotlandunspun.blogspot.com

david said...

"I get the impression the rate of new readers of blogs in general has slowed dramatically with those that do read blogs having their personal favourites and sticking to them."

Think you've hit the nail on the head there, which is actually a on the quality of what's currently available - people are staisfied with what they've got and don't feel the same need to look around for more.

douglas clark said...

Jeff,

I am not convinced by your arguement. I write, some would say absolute rubbish, on Pickled Politics. I try to write more sensible stuff on Liberal Conspiracy.

The point?

These are becoming institutions on the left of politics. They are not going to go away.

Much like a football team replaces it's star striker, these web sites will gain and lose commentators. What they will not do is disappear.

At least that is what I think. And I'd place SNP Tactical Voting in the same category, as long as you want it to be there.

Which is maybe the issue. As long as something is a one man band, then perhaps a post that doesn't get the response you hoped for may lead to despair. And you running up the flag.

I hope you don't, however I'd suggest you make this into a group blog, before that issue exercises you.

And no, this is not me attempting to become a part of that. I have my own track to find.

Just saying.

Jeff said...

Thanks Douglas (and indeed the other commenters who I won't have time to reply to).

It's funny you mention turning this into a group blog, it has crossed my mind a few times but I suspect I'm too much of a control freak to pull it off and I feel like I have plenty in the blogging tank. SNP Home (or whatever) could yet take off though. And you're right about group blogs, multiple contributors allows a site to weather fiercer storms, much like mergers during a recession.

As for down about hits, I was hoping this post wouldn't be interpreted as some sort of sulk about that. I can honestly say you could quarter my stats and i'd still be as happy to write as much as I do.

Anyway, i'm meant to be on a weekend hiatus so off I go to explore this Emerald Isle.

douglas clark said...

Jeff,

If you are a 'control freak', then you are the nicest control freak I have ever encountered.

You answer questions about your posts on here in a completely open way. Quite often you appear to me, at least, to adjust your position based on what other people say.

I have my own definition of what a 'control freak' is, and you, most certainly don't meet that criteria.

Enjoy your trip to the Emerald Isle. My last visit there suggested that you can be an independent nation without being beholden to ancient animosities.

Well, sort of.

What I would say is that I never met an Irishman that thought reunion was the way to go....

Anonymous said...

http://fucato.yourfreehosting.net http://qugaco.emenace.com http://vahiso.1gb.bg
mp4 порно бесплатно
http://paxkoxinxx.t35.com http://havni.rbcmail.ru http://hiduda.yourfreehosting.net
аналоговый спутниковый сигнал
vrotmnenogi