Home from home

*** Currently blogging at http://www.betternation.org/ ***

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Night of the Hard Drives

Is it just me or are bloggers getting a hard time of it? No you're right, it might just be me...

First of all, a (perhaps unexpected) apology. In relation to today's article I think I owe David Maddox an apology given my bleary-eyed, early morning, knee-jerk post so rather than bury it somewhere deep in this post I'll put it front and centre. The man is a journalist, I rolled a pass to him along the 6-yard line. What else should I have expected him to do but ram it into the back of the net?

He did get his facts wrong but only because I got my facts wrong. To that end apologies extend to all manners of people but they will be (or have already been) done in person.

As a wise woman said to me earlier, today's newspapers are tomorrow's fish supper wrappers so all in all it's no big deal. Although I will confess to losing sight in my right eye at around 4pm for a short while due no doubt to some sort of latent stress. It's ironic that one tries to build a profile with their blog, even occasionally peeks into Google News to see if their website has been mentioned anywhere, and then as soon as it is, one wants to put the genie straight back into the bottle.

It begs the question, what's the end game with blogging?

Seemingly out of nowhere, bloggers are the focus of a lot of attention. There has been Wardog, Universality of Cheese, my getting done up like a kipper good and proper today and, deeply regrettably, I know there's another blogger facing deep difficulties out of nowhere but I will say no more than that.

We're not lawyers, we make mistakes, not every t is dotted and every i crossed with requisite care and attention. If healthy debate is to be scrutinised to the extent that online chatter is deemed not worth it then what hope is there for the current mood of anti-politics to be lifted?

The interest does not merely rest with what appears in the newspapers. In the past few days I've had unexpected emails from a tabloid journalist, one from my old chum David Maddox of course, been added to BBC Democracy Live, been in The Times, and that's not to mention a few other things that I can't disclose.

And in an hour's time Newsnight Scotland may well have a segment on political blogging. How do I know? I was asked to do a ten minute interview. I politely declined accurately asserting that I'm better behind the keyboard than I am in front of a camera. And we've seen today that I'm not that good behind a keyboard! Mercifully I suspect that Fiona Hyslop's, em, 'career change' will take up the majority of the 20 minutes.

It would take a remarkable turn of events for bloggers to be the story. The fact that the Spring Conference bloggers' breakfast can somehow be newsworthy has really opened my eyes. Again though, I will fight the temptation to take it out on journalists too much. They have a job to do, as frustrating as it can be for some of us. If I don't want to write something, I just won't switch my computer on. Journalists are not afforded that luxury.

As for other questions regarding this regrettable story, Stuart Winton asks some searching but perfectly fair questions so I will answer them there.

If a news day is slow enough, the story is newsworthy enough. I guess it can be too easy to forget that as we express ourselves over the unforgiving internet unchecked, unedited and uncontrolled.

That of course is as it should be in theory, freedom of expression does extend to the net and a blogger should only be worthy of a story if something truly extraordinary has taken place which is rarely the case. Sadly, reality and theory are not always the happiest of bedfellows. If blogging isn't enjoyable and substance-based banter then it is nothing.

And with that in mind, I see the Lib Dems have been trying to lecture others on how blogging should be done. Well, I'd rather be blogging in scandal than blogging in sandals.

Where is blogging headed? Who is to know but in the heat of an election campaign, a growing focus from the media and given the past few days it looks increasingly like the destination, for me at least, is an alarming precipice.


Consequently, December may be a very light month on here.


Cheers for now.



UPDATE: In the Scotsman article I am quoted as saying that I was "ordered" to take a post down. That is a faithful quote from Mr Maddox but, again, also an inaccurate one due to, ucht, who knows what, it was the wrong word. I was 'asked' to take a post down as I had disrespected the midnight embargo on a Saturday night. I thought I had good reasons for ignoring it as I had not received the email within the mailing list. We argued the case for a short while and in the end I decided for myself that I was in the wrong and it would be appropriate to pull the post which I duly did.

The post was merely a poll that was out that night but my posting it might have compromised a few Sundays running it so, once again, I learned a lesson.

People may think I'm rewriting history but I can assure you that is not the case.

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Well, I'd rather be blogging in scandal than blogging in sandals."

LOL

Holyrood Patter said...

i guess we wont find out what was and wasnt said or misrepresented, but perhaps thats as it should be.
the bloggers breakfast stuff is truly bizarre, i cant believe the likes of john park think its newsworthy, or that a spot of brunch in a cafe organised openly online with an open invite was some sort of top down sleaze ridden conspiracy,

such is lazy journalism

Holyrood Patter said...

i guess we wont find out what was and wasnt said or misrepresented, but perhaps thats as it should be.
the bloggers breakfast stuff is truly bizarre, i cant believe the likes of john park think its newsworthy, or that a spot of brunch in a cafe organised openly online with an open invite was some sort of top down sleaze ridden conspiracy,

such is lazy journalism

Anonymous said...

What's certain is that blogging seems to have frightened the journalists horses.

Why are they so frightened of blogs with at most a few hundred readers?

By breathing life into them via traditional media, they simply hasten their own demise surely.

A nation of citizen bloggers?

Maybe 'V' was rght after all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chqi8m4CEEY

mav said...

Jeff,

I think you may have reached a crossroads here. And that's a huge compliment to what you have achieved. But it may be time to decide.

Do you want a 'career'/living from blogging? Some of your posts recently have hinted pretty strongly that you'd like to be involved with an 'SNP list'. So if you want to be the SNP's Tim Montgomery (or Derek Draper..) now is the time to push for just that. Which means next time Newsnight come calling, you say yes. You demand right of reply in the Scotsman. etc etc. And that way you see if there is a door at SNP HQ you can push open.

Maybe you want to be an SNP MSP? Again, time to push.

But if you don't want that, you are worried how all this affects you at work, which I could fully understand, then its time to ease off. I won't ask you not to stop though. Its not my place. I enjoy your writing, though I disagree with your party and would dearly love to see the demise of your party's leader. But I don't know you. I do know that you work or have worked in the same industry as me and have a similar professional background. And I know if your cv crossed my desk, your commitment to blogging would be something that would have to be raised. Which is why I say you've reached a crossroads.

So all I'll say is, if you are reflecting, make the right choice for you.

Steven F said...

Here's a good example of why blogging is important, and journalists have lost what respect they were ever held in:

The Sunday Times published figures from a MORI poll and used it to run a story about the referendum not looking quite so popular. What they didn't run was the voting intentions showing the SNP ahead for Holyrood AND Westminster. Nor did they show Alex Salmonds 55% satisfaction rating.

If it wasn't for Anthony Wells' excellent blog, maybe none of us would know about those figures.

So you've been Maddoxed? Welcome to life in the SNP. Don't let the Jim Murphys get you down!

Holyrood Patter said...

mav with respect to yourself and jeff, the chances of the SNP accepting a candidate who remains "unconvinced" on independence is slim

jeff is by far and away scotlands best blogger, and his independent mindedness makes that possible, it doesnt put his tag in doubt

Holyrood Patter said...

and if the snp want a tim montgomorie theres a gap in my schedule!

Stephen Glenn said...

Jeff I haven't worn sandals in decades, I'm more likely to go for deck shoes when it gets warm, preferrably on a deck. I also can catgorically say that I have never blogged in them. ;)

More said...

Regarding the Embargoes:

In a previous life, I was a semi-professional video games blogger. It was an extremely enjoyable part of my life, but unsustainable both due to my interests and the intense amount of work I had to put in.
Just about every piece I got after a while was embargoed. If you broke the embargo on one thing when you were that small, you'd end up getting nothing from any of the PR sites.

Embargoes are a serious game in all fields unfortunately and I suspect that Jeff was probably treated a lot better then some would be a a result of his high standing and long term excellence. The idea that he is been 'rewriting history' is absurd given such circumstances.

More comments after I've had a chance to watch Newsnight.

subrosa said...

Sadly young Spook who blogged as Advanced Media Watch has decided to call it a day.

His passion for independence and loyalty to the SNP, even though he wasn't a member, will be missed by many I'm sure.

I too have matters to consider but I'll take advice from those who know the score far better than me.

Enjoy your 'holiday' Jeff.

Stuart Dickson said...

Ipsos MORI Scotland have now released the detailed datasheets from their Public Opinion Monitor November 2009. This is only the 2nd Monitor in what is clearly designed to be new quarterly series. Ipsos MORI’s business plan seems to be to try to sell bits and pieces of the findings to different clients, however this month they failed to sell the topline Voting Intention findings (the Sunday Times Scotland only bought the Ind. Ref. findings).

Note: the fieldwork was back in 19-23 November, not long after the Glasgow North East by-election boost for Labour. Sample size: 1,009.

Westminster voting intention
(+/- change from Ipsos MORI August Monitor)

SNP 34% (+1)
Lab 32% (+5)
Con 15% (-3)
LD 12% (-2)
oth 6% (-2)

So, the Labour boost seems to be coming straight from ‘The Big Squeeze’ of the minor parties, and not from straight SNP switchers (although obviously there is always “churn” which is not revealed by the headline figures).

A very, very satisfying survey for us SNP supporters.

But this is absolutely horrendous news for Annabel Goldie and Tavish Scott. How on earth can the Tories unseat Jim Murphy (East Renfrewshire) and Alistair Darling (Edinburgh South West) on appalling figures like this? The usual excuse trotted out is that the Tories are doing extraordinarily well in the seats they need to do well in, but the longer this “sub-20%” patch continues I am starting to have serious doubts about just where UK GE 2010 is going to end up for the Scottish Tories. A car crash?

Stuart Dickson said...

Ipsos MORI satisfaction ratings (satisfied minus dissatisfied) -> change shown is from August’s Ipsos MORI Monitor:

Alex Salmond +4 (-14)
Gordon Brown -8 (+6)
David Cameron -11 (-9)

So, although Labour and Gordon Brown have had a good few weeks, Gordon Brown is still unpopular in Scotland, although at least he has overtaken David Cameron.

These are the poorest approval ratings for Alex Salmond since he became First Minster. But as they say in sport (I paraphrase): if you can still win when you are having a bad day then that is the sign of a true champion.

All Unionists ought to be worried by Cameron’s poor rating among Scots voters. It is a straw in the wind of the constitutional storm about to hit the British state when PM Dave enters 10 Downing Street.

Stuart Dickson said...

Here is the link to the Nov Monitor:

http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/poll.aspx?oItemId=2523

... and the August Monitor:

http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/poll.aspx?oItemId=2470

Math Campbell said...

I would urge you not to vanish; obviously you'll do what's right for yourself. But I'd still urge you not to. Haven't watched Newsnight yet so I'll have to grab it on iPlayer, I was at a party meeting last night…
If anything, I think you should increase posting, I think if you can you should appear on Newsnight, but retain your independence should SNP HQ come a calling.
Part of the reason I like reading you Jeff is you say it how it is. That's not to say if you were closely aligned with HQ you wouldn't, but perhaps there are times when you'd be asked to "refrain" on a subject rather than post the truth, like we cocked up etc.
Now, it's perfectly fine for HQ to do this to an official blog, a blog run by an endorsed candidate etc. because it's the Party's message, and if they're official, it's seen (rightly) as the Party saying "we cocked up", whereas if you're just a member, it's seen as Jeff calling it fair.

If I wanted to hear the Party's official view on something, I have SNP.org on my menu, it's right there next to my blog!
I want to hear well-balanced SNP-supporting analysis of the situation, and you're the best man for that, by far.

I understand if you can/don't want to go down this line, if you feel it would interfere with your work or family. But if you can, please carry on. And I'd like to openly propose right now that if I can make it to Spring Conference (depends on finances and where it is this year; I guess Glasgow is too much to hope for again), I'll host a Bloggers Breakfast if you won't.
I'm not buying the drinks though.

Anonymous said...

http://legkosex.vox.com/ http://juwisiqe.freehostia.com http://ciwamemu.justfree.com
халявное гей порно
http://xohesa.1gb.bg http://tenanero.1accesshost.com http://tinocovu.d0m.us
секс бутират
vrotmnenogi

Andrew Reeves said...

Jeff - don't you dare stop blogging. Obviously I haven't been in Scotland long enough to know the full 'thing' between the MSM and bloggers.

It is really disappointing to see a few blogs recently stop, including AMW yesterday.

I don't blog with a work hat on, but as you know I will have a go at other parties and have to also take it on the chin when others have a go at my party, and thats the game.

Some journalists want it both ways across the UK, they blog themselves, they take stories from our blogs but as you say sometimes they get defensive.

Blogging is still new on the whole and maybe we all need to help the relationship develop so it is a two way journey, who knows?

On the SNP bloggers breakfast, as the LibDem Bloggers unconference - yes unofficial events go on, but journalists can never quite understand that one, how can you have an unoffical event - very easily, and long may they continue and you blogging.

Yours is one of the best blogs in Scotland!

Jeff said...

Sound advice Mav, thanks v much for that.

Although I'm a quitter and not a fighter for now (Mandelson will be so disappointed in me), I don't see me hanging up the keyboard for good. In truth, a wee break has probably been overdue.

Also, I've been told David Maddox, Iain Dale and Tom Harris were originally scheduled for last night's Newsnight, the reshuffle of course taking last minute priority.

Bugger said...

Jeff

I for one would be reconsidering my position vis-a-vis The Steamie.

The allegory of The Scorpion and The Turtle spring to mind.

Colin said...

Some much-needed relief from Ipsos MORI there. Am I right in saying that this is the first Scottish poll since the by-election that hasn't included some leading question along the lines of "Do you think we should have a referendum now when there are so many other more urgent things to do first?", which I would imagine would tend to queer the results somewhat?

Math Campbell said...

If you look at that last poll, the one that had the "SNP are done" headlines coming out, you'll note there were over 400 Labour-affiliated voters asked. Out of just over a thousand.

I'm sure they justify the weighting by comparing the number of labour supporters to UK-wide voting figures, but with over 400 labour "supporters" and just over 100 SNP supporters, I'd say the numbers were skewed.

Latest IPSOS poll there looks much more in keeping with recent polls and figures, so I'll take that one…

Incidentally Jeff, what mailing list was this you apparently violated?
e-Mail if it's sensitive, but I'm a nosy bugger!

Math Campbell said...

Oh, incidentally, I came across your post on 27th August this year Jeff about another "odd" poll, showing Labour way up and the SNP way down….

You said "EDIT: I don't tend to read the 'Political Party Identification' section of the poll but I did this time and noted it had 469 Labour members. That's from a total sample of 1,078 and equates to 44% of the population.

Given there are 18,800 Labour members in Scotland, 0.376% of the population, is this a whopper of bias in the poll or am I reading it wrong?

Crucially, there were 166 'Other' members noted (presumably mostly SNP) with 15,000 across Scotland.

So if 18,800 Labour members are represented by 469 sample individuals and 15,000 SNP members are represented by only 166 sample individuals, maybe this poll can be discarded as somewhat biased after all...? Or am I 'over-reaching'?"

I'm starting to see a pattern here. That was just after Megrahi, this one was just before the White Paper….
Heaven forbid the pollsters be suspect on this matter…

Crinkly & Ragged Arsed Philosophers said...

When the going gets tough - you have to ask yourself, who's making it tough and why?

Then, as always, you make your choice.

Dubbieside said...

Jeff

Do not let them grind you down.

Anonymous said...

Don't let the "Jim Murphy's" get you down!

John Boettcher said...

I'm thoroughly aghast at this unfolding situation: Even Moridura who post eloquent, thoughtful articles has decided to quit. And now Subrosa is having thoughts about quiting.

Will there be any quality SNP blogs left by the year's end?

How and why is this happening?

Anyway, thanks Jeff for a great blog. I hope you return after taking a wee break.

Regards,
John

Cruachan said...

Good luck Jeff, whatever you decide.

Anonymous said...

I am extremely concerned about this.

The internet is a vital safeguard for democracy and for allowing people who don't have a voice to make themselves heard.

I would advise bloggers who feel pressured into giving up their online practices to remember that they are well within their democratic rights to pursue this activity.

No one, and certainly not for political reasons, is entitled to deprive you of this.

Indeed, be assured that you can very easily find help on this matter simply by googling "rights for bloggers" or something along those lines.

If you feel you are being pressured or even victimised in any way, don't quit. Make yourself heard.

All of this spotlight being thrown on bloggers in Scotland has a distinct whiff of the unacceptable about it.

Know your rights and maintain them.

Anonymous said...

Jeff, You will NEVER get a letter printed in The Tabloidman if you refer to "dwindling readership". They are very touchy about this and I would have thought you would know this.
Resubmit your letter without the magic words and see waht happens.

Anonymous said...

Know your rights, Anon?
What is the right to defame and intimidate?

Mark MacLachlan is not a martyr - he's a thug.

Anonymous said...

"What is the right to defame and intimidate?"

The irony of that statement won't be lost on anyone who follows the downward spiral of Rupert Murdoch's News of the World and it's habit of hacking into phones, it's £200,000 defamation payment to one Tommy Sheridan, the continuous overstepping of the line with paparazzi intrusion of celebrities, printing images of scantily clad women in schoolgirl uniforms and then complaining about pedophiles in our midst......

I could go on.

John Hartigan, the CEO of Rupert Murdoch’s News Limited, labelled all bloggers and alternative media outlets as “political extremists”.

Hartigan went on to savagely dismiss blogs as,

“Something of such little intellectual value as to be barely discernible from massive ignorance......Bloggers don’t go to jail for their work. They simply aren’t held accountable like real reporters….It could be said the blogosphere is all eyeballs and no insights,” snarled Hartigan.

“In the blogosphere, of course, the mainstream media is always found wanting. It really is time this myth was blown apart......Blogs, and a large number of comment sites, specialise in political extremism and personal vilification. Radical sweeping statements without evidence are common.”

Put in the context of these rather sweeping generalisations, one can start to realise where Euan McColms, The News of the World's Scottish Political Editor's interest in blogging stems from and on a more sinister level the kind of resource that is being deployed against individuals in society that wish to speak out against politicians.

Hartigan doesn’t seem to grasp the fact that the mainstream media is always found wanting because they habitually lie about news events and spin stories to suit the demands of their corporate owners.

This is the very reason why blogs and alternative media outlets have become so popular and have eaten into the mainstream media’s audience share, because people are sick of being treated like idiots, sick of being lied to, and are desperately in search of the truth.

Indeed, Hartigan’s boss Rupert Murdoch confessed to the fact that his media empire tried to shape public opinion to support the war in Iraq In other words, Murdoch’s many prominent news outlets wantonly put out propaganda supporting the manufactured case for invasion.

Murdoch admitted to this while lamenting the corporate media’s “loss of power” to alternative media and Internet blogs, seemingly unaware of the fact that the two are directly connected.

Now who will step up to the plate to take on and expose these vested interests and their attack on citizen bloggers?

Anonymous said...

Hi fellow anonymous poster,

That's a lot of ad hominem irrelevancy there.

Nice.

Anonymous said...

Rupert is a big boy I'm sure he can stand up for himself.