Home from home

*** Currently blogging at http://www.betternation.org/ ***

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

GE2010 - Scotland's Top 5 Local Issues

Regular readers will know that I like few things more than to take a recent Scottish poll, apply the national swing to each constituency and ‘predict’ the results that come out the other side. There are of course numerous problems with this approach with the chief one being the unpredictable variable of ‘local factors’, an Achilles heel that I have no doubt cursed more often than Beckham will have cursed his own these past few days. (Too soon? For the record, I’m devastated Becks is out the World Cup)
 
Anyway, rather than skirt around these elephants in the Electoral Calculus room, I thought I would consider what the top five local factors in Scotland actually are as I start to warm up for the General Election campaign proper.
 
It was difficult to pull out only five so I won’t try to rank them and will instead list them arbitrarily but feel free to add your own and/or rubbish any of mine:
 
 
Borders Rail Link – As someone who in a past life had to regularly commute to Galashiels from the North side of Edinburgh I would politely suggest that this project has been long overdue. I don’t know if it was the Labour/Lib Dem coalition that got the ball rolling on this one or if it was the current SNP Government but I would imagine that an appreciative Borders community would reward whoever deserved it with an upswing in votes.
 
The train will eventually snake through the Labour and Lib Dem constituencies of David Hamilton’s Midlothian and Michael Moore’s Roxburgh, Berwickshire and Selkirk. With the latter, an area that is largely Tory vs Lib Dem, tactial voting considerations may well outweigh any polling impact as a result of a train line which, to be fair, is already in the bag and consequently may not be uppermost in the minds of those going to the polls.
 
CalMac Ferries – The question of whether the ferry operator should operate crossings on a Sunday around the islands on the West coast has been a huge issue for the more religious communities in Angus MacNeil’s SNP constituency of Western Isles and Alan Reid’s Lib Dem constituency of Argyll & Bute.
 
I fancy both men to enjoy a significant incumbency factor to be honest and be returned to Westminster but there is no doubt what the number one issue will be in this part of Scotland.
 
The East Lothian Question (a tremendous pun, shamelessly ‘borrowed’ from Stephen Glenn) – Anne Moffat’s many woes have meant that Labour go into this contest in clear disarray. Some crises are imagined by the opposition, some are bona fide. This one ticks the latter box. With 7 weeks to go we are still unsure whether Anne will be the candidate or not and that alone, despite a considerable majority to defend, is enough to tentatively suggest that one of the other parties will prise this seat from Labour’s grasp.
 
Trams – I had lost track (pardon the pun) of the flailing tram project until I read a startling article in the Scotsman explaining that even the most ardent of supporters of the transport project could be losing faith in it (I know one person who won’t, come what may). I understood from it that after years of disruption and some businesses even closing down on the street, the route may not even extend to Leith Walk initially due to a lack of money.
 
The question of who will bear the brunt of any impact in the election itself is a fascinating one. The Greens, Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems were all in favour of the project but it was the SNP and Lib Dem council who were tasked with delivering it. That’s a double-whammy of bad news for the yellow camp but if I was a disgruntled voter who wished to protest about the trams, I wouldn’t know where to cast my vote. (For the record, I’ve come full circle. I regret the ballooning expense but I’m a tram convert and think they’ll be great in the end)
 
Edinburgh North & Leith is a seat that will clearly be impacted by this and it is little wonder that SNP PPC Calum Cashley has been continuing his anti-tram stance so resolutely. In a seat where all four (or even five) main parties will have good reason to be confident of a good result, the ramifications of ‘trams’ as an issue could well be crucial.
 
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route – A project that apparently makes the Edinburgh trams look like plain sailing. First announced in 2003, the construction has not yet begun with approval given (again) in late 2009. Those who live along the route have voiced some fierce criticism of it and Aberdeen North’s Frank Doran, Aberdeen South’s Anne Begg and Aberdeenshire West’s Robert Brown could potentially face electoral trouble as a result of the heavy delays stretching back into the last administration, albeit in Holyrood and not at Westminster. Anne Begg, with a majority of only 1,348 is the most vulnerable from unexpected voting behaviour though at the same time of course may ultimately be the beneficiary.
 
 
So, that’s my five cents worth and with cuts vs spending and Cameron vs Brown as the overriding national narratives, it’s probably well worth keeping the above local factors (and no doubt more beside) in mind as May 6th approaches.

25 comments:

Fitalass said...

Jeff, the MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine is Libdem Robert Smith.

Jeff said...

Thanks Fitalass,

This is going to sound a bit weak now but it's actually 'Sir' Robert Smith.

Stephen Glenn said...

Jeff hardly a shameful borrowing, you did credit where you got it from. ;)

Chris said...

I'm an edinburger who supports independence *and* trams (and cycling) - and since the SNP seems so madly anti-tram and anti-bike and anti-everything-except-their-cars, I won't be voting for them in any election soon, I'm afraid.
If they were less hostile to sensible ways of getting around I'd vote for them like a shot.

Anonymous said...

The local issue for me and it is the only one! Is how to get rid rid of my sitting Labour MP, one Anne Begg and without having to vote for Labours sleeping partners in the Fibby Dumbs!?

In this election there is no other issue for me!

wee folding bike said...

I'm not sure the SNP were against trams so much as against this scheme because they had doubts about the possibility of it coming in on budget. Reports today suggest that only part of it will be built.

The opposition are not pro tram they just wanted to put a spoke in the SNP wheel (and not a nice double butted spoke either).

I'm really not sure where the CTC are heading with their vote bike campaign. The number of people who will choose who to vote for on the basis of cycling provision could be too small to make much odds.

http://www.ctc.org.uk/desktopdefault.aspx?tabid=5371

Even then not all cyclists want the same thing. I'm in favour of ASLs (Advanced Stop Lines) but not separate provision. We pay for the roads, they go where I want to go and I have a right to use them.

I'm not keen on trams. They are expensive, and can only go where there are tracks. Trolley busses might have been a better thing to try first. They would have been cheaper to install, can include batteries to run where there is no catenary and they don't have tracks to catch bike wheels. I used to know a guy with ears at different heights because his bike wheel got stuck in a Buchanan St tram line and he was hit by a car.

Steven said...

Jeff,

Good points. In Edinburgh we should benefit from the fact that we, and we alone, opposed the Trams. We said that things were likely to go wrong from the start, and how right we were!

I would emphasise the Glasgow Labour situation. It should make Glasgow North winnable, and Glasgow East retainable.

But also in Fife, the London-based cuts have hit our council hard. Labour are trying to claim that the cuts could be avoided through giving no suggestions as to how they could be avoided. So vengeance will probably be directed against Labour in Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes (where Ed Milliband has been recently alongside Roy - a sign of trouble?) and Dunfermline (where, let's be honest, the Liberals probably won't hold on).

The East Lothian factor too is key.

Same with the Devinegate in Livingston.

I think we should do well in the General Election.

Marcia said...

It would have been better if the tram project in Edinburgh had considered using parts of the old railway branch lines that abound throughout Edinburgh in the scheme or considered a light rail system instead of trams.

The Borders line is a closure that should not have happened in 1969 and pleased that Stewart Stevenson invited one of the opponent's of the line closure to the starting of the works to re-open the line last week.

tony said...

Not sure if I have been banned since you have not allowed my previous supportive posts past moderation, but here goes;

You are missing out on the Glasgow M74 missing link which has been accredited to the SNP and may well help john Mason retain his seat. The costruction process is well under way and quite a few bridges now cross roads, thus broadcasting it's imminence.

Wardog said...

Renewables and the potential that they encompass is the key vote winner for the aspirational, positive and savvy voter.

Putting in place realistic financing to accelerate Scotland's move towards zero carbon cuts across so many issues including everything from fuel poverty to independence that it must take centre stage from now on. The SNP must out green the green party with sensible policies that maximise Scotland's energy autonomy, maximise our enterprise / export potential and maximise our ability to funnel European funding into trans-european infrastructure like the inter-connector.

It's these projects that will give our manufacturing base the boost it needs and drive an independent Scotland SUSTAINABLY into the future.

NoOffenceAlan said...

I think the Beauly/Denny pylon route will be a more important local issue than some of these 5.

Kenneth said...

I feel positive about the election. I think we will win between 15 and 22 seats.

If we achieve this and the Tories get between 0 and 3 then this should provide the ideal environment for constitutional change.

Jeff said...

Sorry Stephen, I meant shameless. It was quite shameful that at the time of that post of yours I spent far too much time thinking of a good EL gag and drew a blank.

Anyway, I see you've levelled it up with your last post. Touche...

Jeff said...

Steven, loving the optimism!

Not sure if the SNP can get away with saying they were against trams if they were jointly responsible for delivering. Politics, and life in general, is all about stumping up and doing things you don't want to.

I'm still sceptical the 'Westminster cuts' line will work. Those cuts partly stem from two Scottish banks going to the wall so the blame game can work against you sometimes.

Jeff said...

Steven, loving the optimism!

Not sure if the SNP can get away with saying they were against trams if they were jointly responsible for delivering. Politics, and life in general, is all about stumping up and doing things you don't want to.

I'm still sceptical the 'Westminster cuts' line will work. Those cuts partly stem from two Scottish banks going to the wall so the blame game can work against you sometimes.

cynicalHighlander said...

"Those cuts partly stem from two Scottish banks going to the wall so the blame game can work against you sometimes."

No they were Global banks with a Scottish name only as all their taxes were paid to Westminster who set the rules. Why should UK taxpayers of bailed them out as they were corporate businesses and the World wouldn't of stopped if they had been allowed to go to the wall. The only beneficiaries were the top bosses and a Labour government saving its face.

Jeff said...

"Not sure if I have been banned since you have not allowed my previous supportive posts past moderation, but here goes"

It starts.

Tony, many comments didn't make the cut in the last post and are still waiting to be read, partly due to the sensitivity of the subject and my twitchiness but mostly because I don't have internet in my flat and occasionally I don't fancy thrashing my phone in the small window of free time I have on a weekday, sorting through what's spam, what's sensible to publish and what's not. I'll try my best to get all comments but give me a break hey?

As for your comment, I did overlook the M74 extension. I guess I don't hear much about it which is why and, sad as it may be, as it hasn't attracted controversy I wonder if that means it passes by more unnoticed that AWPR or trams etc? It's certainly a lot of money being spent so for that reason alone one may think there'll be an appreciative tranche of voters somewhere (i don't know what the route is)

The green streak inside me can't help but add that bigger and bigger roads isn't necessarily a good thing.

Anonymous said...

Jeff

I would have to take issue with your final post, on two counts.

First, you can hardly claim that the SNP were in favour of the trams. They were forced into continuing with the project by the Unionist parties, who are now revising history in predictable fashion. Once contracts were signed, the City Council can't back out of them. No SNP people are directly involved in delivery of the tram. Some people will be fooled by the revisionist approach of the LibDems in particular but this generally-supportive lurker didn't expect you to be one of them!

Second - "Scottish banks" is straight out of the Unionist playbook. RBS was the world's largest banks and was a multinational player functionally headquartered in London. And what do you think the H in HBoS stood for? Really disappointed that you're helping propagate this egregious Scottish-cringe play.

What next? We won't be able to get EastEnders or visit family south of the border?

Andrew BOD said...

Jeff

Given that the majority of local authorities are run by the SNP and Lib Dems, and that each council (to varying degrees) has had to implement unpopular costcutting measures to balance budgets, I believe this will be a factor in the GE. It's easy to underestimate this as an issue, but local press coverage and letters to newspapers suggests a tough time for the parties running the councils.

AWPR will be an issue South and West of Aberdeen, and could see swings to Tory and Lib Dems. However, both the approval and the handling of the Trump application may be a bigger issue.

redcliffe62 said...

If Megrahi is alive and there are pics of him walking around apparently well, having had all those tubes in him last year, then I think that might resonate with some people, regardless of the right and wrongs.
Closer to number 1 issue than number 5.
If I was an opponent I would be getting those pics and videos ready.....

Jeff said...

Cynicalhighlander,

whether the banks should have been bailed out is a separate matter but I don't see how anyone can boast of two world leading banks as part of a reason for choosing independence and then sever that link to Scotland when things go belly up. Fred Goodwin is from north of the border last time I checked.

Blaming London and Westminster for the UK as a whole having less money to spend without recognition that we might be jointly and severally responsible for where we are just seems a bit crude to me is all I'm saying. Maybe I just believe in teamwork a bit more than some others do.

Jeff said...

Anon, interesting comment, thanks.

1) When did I say the SNP were in favour of the trams? I know they weren't and only grudgingly accepted the project after being outvoted in the Chamber and accepting the will of the Parliament. As for their not being responsible for the delivery of the project I have to admit I don't know much about TIE and how it's all set up but I find it hard to believe that the SNP and Lib Dems aren't both ultimately responsible for what is and isn't delivered in Edinburgh while it runs the Council. Again, it comes down to stepping up and taking responsibility but I admit I don't know the detail so may somehow have my wires crossed there.

2) You're far too sensitive to the simple phrase "Scottish banks" and can assure you I'm 'propagating' nothing of the sort. My point is, if we want to paint ourselves as innocent bystanders in these financial woes, suggest the causes of it stopped at the border and consequently we're victims of an outrageous cut in our spending allowance then, with all due respect, it's not me that has the tartan cringe.

Jeff said...

Andrew BOD, I'd go along with that, that the make-up of the local council will be a local factor in itself. An astute observation. Nice one.

I suppose we're not used to so many non-Labour councils since this is the first GE since the more proportional system was introduced so it'll be hard to predict the effect.

I don't know much about the Trump affair tbh so you may well be right there too.

A Total Banker said...

Jeff, nevertheless you refer to them as Scottish banks.

This is false and you know it is so why say so? They are British banks with a Scottish heritage.

Until the crises the RBS was nearly ALWAYS referred to as the the Royal Bank as used by the BBC and all reporting south of the border.


Yes there is joint responsibility but how for example does British Sir Freds birthplace come into it? So is brown allegedly Scottish though I have never heard him state that when asked.

When UK institutions and spokespersons start calling our Energy resources Scottish, then we can maybe argue over our responsibilities, perhaps?

Jeff said...

Charming name you've given yourself there.

I think you're changing the point of the debate and, with respect, belittling it, but here's the deal:

The banks can be Scottish and we can be Scottish.

The banks can be British and we can be British.

Or the banks can be British and we can be Scottish.

The first two stack up in my mind, either way is fine, but the third one is just a bit childish and an attempt to wash oneself of responsibility for dealing with the fallout.
As a corollary of that, there is a strong argument for independence right now but it's not encapsulated in the phrase 'Westminster cuts'.