<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post1913763810104788688..comments</id><updated>2011-10-08T23:26:11.260+01:00</updated><category term='west'/><category term='leadership contest'/><category term='scotland'/><category term='estherann'/><category term='uk border agency'/><category term='edinburgh'/><category term='Iain Gray'/><category term='election'/><category term='tory'/><category term='lothian'/><category term='night'/><category term='holyrood'/><category term='guest post'/><category term='ken livingstone'/><category term='tactical voting'/><category term='2007'/><category term='warwick lightfoot'/><category term='wendy'/><category term='duncan thorp'/><category term='snp'/><category term='labour'/><category term='Mid Scotland'/><category term='independent'/><category term='wendy alexander'/><category term='uestion'/><category term='Andy Kerr'/><category term='region'/><category term='Cathy Jamieson'/><category term='polls'/><category term='Fife'/><category term='mayor'/><category term='asylum'/><category term='spending'/><category term='londontorynightmayor'/><category term='deja vu'/><category term='london'/><category term='Margaret Curran'/><category term='boris johnson'/><title type='text'>Comments on SNP Tactical Voting: Labour should pick Ed (what do you mean 'which one...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/feeds/1913763810104788688/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html'/><author><name>Jeff</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01485196287282298695</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://bp3.blogger.com/_5v0GDLJ2P24/SI4lexAketI/AAAAAAAAAi8/P_8oKE9MUvs/S220/n679604415_119603_1067.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-1227165299339569877</id><published>2010-08-30T21:53:24.899+01:00</published><updated>2010-08-30T21:53:24.899+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Not sure Ed beats David in terms of green credenti...</title><content type='html'>Not sure Ed beats David in terms of green credentials.  Before being foreign sec, MillieD was environment sec too.  And I thought he was good.  I remember hearing him being interviewed on Today, and in the course of the interview he made me realise that he was quite genuinely a &amp;#39;bright young thing&amp;#39;, who may actually make headway.  He was promoted months later, more&amp;#39;s the pity.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/1227165299339569877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/1227165299339569877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html?showComment=1283201604899#c1227165299339569877' title=''/><author><name>mav</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-1913763810104788688' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/posts/default/1913763810104788688' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-346537270'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-5298881893000253200</id><published>2010-08-30T20:39:48.189+01:00</published><updated>2010-08-30T20:39:48.189+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Cheers Chris. A very good point and I must admit I...</title><content type='html'>Cheers Chris. A very good point and I must admit I&amp;#39;ve never really thought about that aspect of 97 before, despite it now being startlingly obvious.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is perhaps unfair to automatically assume that David M would continue the downsides of New Labour under his leadership but I&amp;#39;m afraid I can&amp;#39;t shake the hunch that he would.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/5298881893000253200'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/5298881893000253200'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html?showComment=1283197188189#c5298881893000253200' title=''/><author><name>Jeff</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01485196287282298695</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://bp3.blogger.com/_5v0GDLJ2P24/SI4lexAketI/AAAAAAAAAi8/P_8oKE9MUvs/S220/n679604415_119603_1067.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-1913763810104788688' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/posts/default/1913763810104788688' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-97157526'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-4844893134265411985</id><published>2010-08-30T20:24:23.681+01:00</published><updated>2010-08-30T20:24:23.681+01:00</updated><title type='text'>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;New Labour must have emanated from Old Lab...</title><content type='html'>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;New Labour must have emanated from Old Labour for a reason&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Labour was all about a narrow clique of right wingers (Mandelson in particular) parasitising a fine and noble party.... Yes, you know my views on that odious man, but consider this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Labour the was always going to win the 97 election, thanks to the good work of John Smith plus the shambles of the ERM and the Tories tearing themselves apart in the latter years of administration. The sad thing is that Blair and Mandelson persuaded Labour that they all had to become right wing in order to win - and the party held it&amp;#39;s nose...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reality of course is that Labour would have won anyway, and Labour would not have had to sacrifice it&amp;#39;s values.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Labour &amp;amp; Mandy will, in time, be shown to be a passing phase in the Labour Party - nothing to do with the party&amp;#39;s history and values and no place its rebuilding and future.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/4844893134265411985'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/1913763810104788688/comments/default/4844893134265411985'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html?showComment=1283196263681#c4844893134265411985' title=''/><author><name>Chris</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01290436372566496124</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='15073909983868189179'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='26' src='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_96xCeLmxgzg/SKhukTH6n7I/AAAAAAAAAW8/qb5llLR1OlM/S220/CJ.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.snptacticalvoting.com/2010/08/labour-should-pick-ed-what-do-you-mean.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5457608463947849320.post-1913763810104788688' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5457608463947849320/posts/default/1913763810104788688' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1583167706'/></entry></feed>
